XXXV - 5(02) “Watchman, what of the night?” "The hour has come, the
hour is striking and striking at you,
The Call of the Pope & WHO Responded
Editor's Preface
This issue will be primarily devoted to two items: 1) the Papal call to prayer for peace
at The report that was given in the Australian Record noted a factor that has been
largely ignored - the conditions which surrounded the witness which revealed
the working of the Holy Spirit. In retrospect, no one who is honest, can give
accolades to Dr. B. B. Beach when his conduct and condemnation of the young men
before the WCC Assembly reveals conduct which does despite to the Holy Spirit
of God (Heb. 10:29). This peerless witness by the young men was considered
"crude" by both Adams and Beach. Did not the religious leadership of The question remains. On that hot summer day in Page 2 "When they Shall Say, Peace" Before reciting the Angelus on Sunday, January 20, this year,
Pope John Paul II explained his call for a Day of Prayer for Peace on Thursday,
January 24 at This
is the spirit in which, the Day of Fasting was observed last 14
December, with great consensus, and in the same spirit, the Day of Prayer
for Peace will be held in The pope noted that since that first encounter of "the
representatives of all the world religions" in Assisi, "a new spirit
- often called 'the spirit of Assisi' - has guided interreligious dialogue and
links it indissolubly to the commitment to justice, the protection of creation
and to peace," Will this come to mean that any one who refuses to dialogue
with any power or entity he believes to be teaching contrary to the Word of
God, will be categorized as a part of the network of terrorism? Under a cloak
of peace, will the persecutions of the past, be revived? In this brief message, the Pope, was quick to follow with the
assurance that The Day of Prayer for Peace does not in any way indulge
in "religious syncretism." "In fact," he adds
"each religious group will pray in a different place in accord with its
own faith, its own language, its own tradition, and with full respect for the
others." The factor that bound together the participants at Assisi on
January 24 was "the certainty that peace is a gift of God,"
and that each believer is called to be a peacemaker (ibid.) There is no question
but that "peace" is a gift of God, and we are to be
"peacemakers." Where is the line to be drawn? "Can two walk
together, except they be agreed?" (Amos 3:3). A new word has been invoked
into the ecumenical picture. After citing the organizational plans to be used
at On
this basis, not only men
and women of different affiliations can collaborate, but indeed must engage in defending
and promoting effectively the recognition of human rights, an indispensable condition
for authentic and lasting peace (ibid.
Emphasis his; underscoring mine.) There is given in Micah a "last day" prophecy
involving "peace" under the guidance of religion with the comment
that "all people will walk everyone in the name of his god" (4:1-2,
5). Did we see a beginning fulfilment of this ancient prophecy in the
development of "the spirit of In the issue of L'Osservatore
Romano which followed the Day of Prayer for Peace at The headline of this issue of L'Osservatore Romano read - " Page 3 by Dr. Conrad Raiser of the WCC, and the Pope concluding the commitment
with these words: Violence
never again! War never again! Terrorism never again! In the name of God, may
every religion bring upon earth Justice and Peace, Forgiveness and Life, Love! (30 January 2002, pp. 1-2) The next day, the Pope invited the 200 plus religious leaders
who participated at In the call to pray for peace at When
religious teachers are pointing forward to long ages of peace and prosperity,
... then it is that sudden destruction cometh upon them, and they shall not
escape. (PP, p. 104; compare
with 1 Thess. 5:1-3) We might ask, "Does the 'pointing' indicate an
accomplished fact, or is the 'pointing' to an objective desired as at The call to prayer at Adventist "Statesman" Responds to Papal Call In the January 30, issue of L'Osservatore Romano, there was listed the names of the "Two Hundred
Religious Leaders" who joined "the Holy Father in This quasi-organization was formerly known as the World
Confessional Families, and it was through this organization, that B. B. Beach,
as its Secretary, presented the gold medallion, as a symbol of the Seventh-day
Adventist Church, to the then reigning pontiff, Paul VI, in 1977. An article in the Adventist
Review, written by an Associate Editor, presenting B. B. Beach as a
peerless Adventist Statesman, appeared two months prior to the The Beginnings Beach marks as "the big event in his life," the Page 4 invitation of F. D. Nichol, then editor of the Review, to attend the second
session of Vatican Council II. He was at the time serving as education director
of the Northern Europe-West Africa Division of the Church. In The final chapters of the book discuss officially sanctioned
conversations between the WCC, and the 1) In
1967, a Seventh-day Adventist theologian was appointed by the Central Committee
of the WCC to sit on the Faith and Order Commission. The Committee's selection,
Dr. Earle Hilgert, was approved by the SDA General Conference Committee.
Hilgert at the time was serving as professor of New Testament Studies at 2) "Since the
conversations got under way [1965], it has been accepted procedure for the 3) "Since 1968 the General Conference of
Seventh-day Adventists has been actively represented at the annual meeting of
'Secretaries of the World Confessional Families'" (p. 100). [In the Review article by The CWC Just what is the Christian World Communions? This is the
first question asked in a letter dated October 11, 1977, to Elder M. S. Nigri,
then a vice president of the General Conference, by Azenilto G. Brito, Editor
of 0 Atalaia published by the
Church's Brazil Publishing House. When the Portuguese edition of L'Osservatore reporting B. B. Beach's
visit to the Pope reached Beach mentions to Brito that as secretary he is responsible
"for preparing the agenda and handling the minutes or report of the
conference" but suggests to Brito, "there is no usefulness in giving
any publicity to this fact." In a letter dated April 1, 1975, from the
Faith and Order Commission of the WCC, it was stated that the Commission
"relates to that conference in a consultative manner." Does one
counsel a non-entity? Are minutes and an agenda prepared for just a yearly
"chit-chat"? CWC is best described as a quasi-organization, and the Dr. Beach told Elder Brito that most of the annual meetings
of the CWC take place in Page 5 him with a gold medallion, which is also given by the General
Conference to some of the public dignitaries who visit the headquarters of the
Church. The idea for this medallion was conceived by the Director of
the Department of Communications of the General Conference so as to be a part
of a series of medallions being prepared by the Presidential Art Medals, Inc.,
of There is no question but that the committee envisioned a
medallion expressing the basic teachings of the Church. The obverse or front
side seeks to depict the Second Coming of Christ, but does not reflect the
Biblical picture of a conquering Christ leading the armies of Heavens, but
rather a risen Lord receiving the veneration of angels. One cannot be sure
whether Christ's feet are resting on the earth behind some clouds, or not, a
key factor in the Biblical description of the Second Coming. The reverse or
back side of the medallion seeks to set forth the Sabbath as well as the Cross
of redemption and the Bible as the basis of doctrine. While the other
commandments are listed by number only, the Fourth Commandment has inscribed
below it "Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy." The Roman
Catholic Church - noting it as the Third Commandment - admonishes:
"Remember that thou keep holy the Sabbath day" (The Convert's Catechism of Christian Doctrine, page 49). No
difference, except in numbering. The core of Adventist teaching regarding the
Fourth Commandment is that "the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord our
God." That is absent. The real issue is what the Medallion is perceived to be, and
to whom it was given. In the Review
of August 11, 1977 (p. 23), W. Duncan Eva, a vice president of the General
Conference, reported on the presentation of the medallion to the Pope. He
wrote, "the medallion was a gold-covered symbol of the To give the medallion to various foreign political leaders
who visit the General Conference offices is one thing, but to take the
medallion and place it as "a symbol" of the Church in the hands of
one designated in the Scriptures as "that man of sin. . . the mystery of
iniquity" (II Thess 2:21, 7) is something significantly different. This is
no light matter that can be passed off as simply a "missionary"
witness. The witness to cardinal concepts of the Church on the medallion is
blurred by Catholic sculpturing. Beach's participation in the CWC is open to
question if the Church is what it professes to be, the spiritual Israel of God.
Two years prior to the giving of the medallion, the Church in
a court case before the Federal judiciary acknowledged a change of belief which
served to justify Beach's presentation. In a legal brief submitted in the case,
EEOC vs. PPPA, the Church affirmed: Although
it is true that there was a period in the life of the Seventh-day Adventist
Church when the denomination took a distinctly anti-Roman Catholic viewpoint,
and the term "hierarchy" was used in a pejorative sense to refer to
the papal form of church governance, that the attitude on the Church's part was
nothing more than the manifestation of widespread anti-popery among
conservative protestant denominations in the early part of this century and the
latter part of the last, and which has now been consigned to the historical
trash heap so far as the Seventh-day Adventist Church is concerned. (Excerpts Legal Documents, p. 41;
emphasis supplied) A Peerless Witness Roy Adams prefaced his eulogy of Beach with an incident which
occurred at the Seventh Assembly of the WCC in Page 6 opportunity, some young men entered the assembly with a large
banner which read, "Seventh Day Adventists believe THIS PROPHESIED
ROMEWARD UNITY IS THE SPIRIT OF ANTICHRIST." To this banner were attached
helium balloons which carried it to the upper reaches of the auditorium. When
first reporting this incident in the Adventist
Review (May 2, 1991, p. 10), as a reporter in attendance at the WCC Seventh
Assembly, The Australian Record,
the official organ of the South Pacific Division, gave some very interesting
data concerning this incident. With Beach and Adams at the Assembly was Elder Ray Coombe, the Director of the
South Pacific Division's Communication Department. He reported the events in
the March 23, 1991 issue of the Record. The Assembly was discussing at the
time a report on the Vatican-WCC Joint Working Group (JWG). The reaction to the
banner was mixed according to Coombe. Some were amused, and some were angered
but "other observers generally agreed that the demonstration had been
cleverly carried out." Then Coombe made this telling comment: It
could not have been more perfectly timed. Even delegates within the plenary
session could not have predicted the time when the report of the JWG would be
considered. There is no way the demonstrators could have known that the closer
links between the WCC and the Roman Catholic Church were being discussed at the
very moment that they released their banner (p. 10). This should tell any honest soul something. If no man knew,
and the timing was perfect, Who knew? Who directed by His Spirit, and ordered
events of nature so that doors were wide open at the moment so that the finest
hour in Australian Adventist witness might be made? Neither Beach nor Adams
sensed the Spirit's working. Beach in his reaction before the WCC Assembly
sought to disassociate himself from the young men who planned and executed the
witness by stating - "Like other churches, we have our dissidents and
people who use their liberty in inappropriate though somewhat comical
ways." Men who were "sickened" by and who publicly deplored what
they considered to be "crude," though evidence points to the working
of the Holy Spirit, are still functioning in high places in the Church. A reader in Was
the hand at Belshazzar's feast "moral and ethical"? Was John the
Baptist following ethical practices when he called the leaders of the church
"vipers and hypocrites"? Jesus Himself referred to them as
"whited sepulchres." Was this polite? When was the invitation
extended to Elijah to present his case through "proper channels"? (May 4, 1991, p. 3). A decade has passed, and to my knowledge neither Beach, nor
Adams have given an answer to these questions. Now Adams reviews the
events of that day and the response given by Beach to the Seventh Assembly of
the WCC in His
articulation of the This cover story has a subtitle - "Sometimes a group
does not recognize they have a treasure in their midst." Would it not have
been more accurate to have reported, that it was a sad day when representatives
of the Church failed to recognize the working of the Spirit of God and sought
to blunt its intrusion. Instead of exalting a man, a confession of guilt in
rejection of the Spirit would have been more apropos. Page 7 the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists is listed as
being represented by Dr. Bert Beach as a "Delegated Representative."
In a letter dated "5 June 1991" from the General Secretariat, Seventh
Assembly office the status "delegated representatives" is defined: "Delegated
representatives" are persons representing organizations with which the WCC
maintains relationship, such as associate councils of churches, certain world
ecumenical organizations, etc. They
have a right to speak in plenary but not to vote. (emphasis supplied) In a second letter dated "15 July 1991,"the same
office stated - "The churches which send a delegated representative to the
assembly are associate member churches of the WCC." It was On that memorable day in 1991, the Spirit of God was not only
sending a message of what "the spirit of antichrist" was to the
Seventh Assembly, but also a warning of where associate membership in the WCC
had taken the SDA Church. It went unheeded and was even defied by the
"Adventist Statesman." Now at the call of the Pope to come to # AVAILABLE (Link to Order Page-Prices Subject to Change): So Much in Common. Co-authored by Dr.
Lukas Viscera of the WIC and B. B. Beach. First printing by WIC. Post-paid -
US$6.00. Steps to EEOC vs. PPPA - Documentary of Legal
Briefs and Affidavits in Federal Court case #74-2025 CBR. Post-paid US$5.00.
(Limited quantity available) All three - US post-paid - $15.00; One Issue Only -- In the
great controversy between Christ and Satan, there is but one issue, and that is
truth. Jesus declared that the devil "abode not in the truth," and he
is the Father of all who do likewise (John 8:44). The deceptive power of the
mystery of iniquity overwhelms because "the love of the truth" is not
the motivating factor in the life (II Thess. 2:10). If we are not born of the
Spirit of truth, His workings often embarrass us. We consider them crude and
inappropriate. At
the heart of genuine Christianity is the cross, on which was crucified Him who
declared of Himself, "I am the truth" (John 14:6). In so doing, the
Jewish hierarchy sealed the fate of the Jewish nation. Is there any difference
between what the Jewish leaders did, and what is done when the Church alters or
abridges the truth entrusted to it? Think on These Things -- "The papacy is just what prophecy
declared that she would be, the apostasy of the latter times ... Shall this
power, whose record for a thousand years is written in the blood of saints, be
now acknowledged as a part of the church of Christ?" -- Great Controversy. p. 571 "It is the rejection of Bible truth which makes men approach to infidelity. It is a backsliding church that lessens the distance between itself and the papacy." -- Signs, Feb. 19, 1894
WEBSITE
E-
Originally published by Adventist Laymen's Foundation of Mississippi/Arkansas
Wm. H. Grotheer, Editor
Adventist Laymen's Foundation was chartered in 1971 by Elder Wm. H. Grotheer, then 29 years in the Seventh-day Adventist
ministry, and associates, for the benefit of Seventh-day Adventists who were deeply concerned about the compromises of fundamental
doctrines by the Church leaders in conference with those who had no right to influence them. Elder Grotheer began to publish the monthly "Thought Paper," Watchman, What of the Night? (WWN) in January, 1968, and continued the publication as Editor until the end of 2006. Elder Grotheer died on May 2, 2009.
|