XXIII -
12(90 Excerpt)
“Watchman,
what of the night?”
"The
hour has come, the hour is striking and striking at you,
the hour and the end!" Eze. 7:6 (Moffatt)
IRAQI FALLOUT
Prophetic Speculation Rife
Daniel 11 Receives Major
Emphasis
(Excerpt from WWN12(90))
Since the invasion of Kuwait
by the forces of Saddam Hussein, the prophetic speculators have been having a
heyday. Judging from the number of "junk bond" interpretations being
offered, these new versions of prophetic speculation must be proving lucrative.
One such speculator who anticipated these current entries into the "bond
market" must be rejoicing that his prophetic insights exceeded those of
Gabriel. A while back he offered the "junk bond" interpretation that
the "he-goat" of Daniel 8 which "came from the west" and
"touched not the ground" was the American airforce
flying into the Middle East. Most of the recent offerings from the speculator's
portfolio focus on the final verses of Daniel 11 defining "the king of the
north" and "the king of the south." This emphasis is due to the
fact of what has happened in Eastern Europe which permitted such a show of
"unity" among the nations of the world over the Iraqi invasion of
Kuwait.
It would be impossible to
discuss these various "junk bond" interpretations individually, so
from the various ones which have come to our desk, we have chosen one to
discuss, and this choice for several reasons. It gives the appearance of
scholarship, and uses many quotations from authoritative sources to clothe its
error, thus making more deceptive . its
"junk bond" interpretation. While the Iraqi crisis is not mentioned,
the events which preceded the display of world unity are emphasized based on
Daniel 11. These "prophetic insights" were written in a series
captioned "Tidings of a Whirlwind," by J. M. Rafferty, side-kick of
Ty Gibson, who is one of the "many voices" which the servant of the
Lord warned would come to confuse minds at this point in time. (R&H,, Dec. 13, 1892) We have-parts I & II of the series which contains sufficient mis-information for the purpose of this article.
The basic premise upon
which this whole "junk bond" interpretation of Rafferty rests is the
identifications of the "king of the south" and the "king of the
north." To give the impression of extensive linguistic learning, he writes
under the sub-heading of "The King of the South" - "The word
'south' is derived from a Hebrew word which translates 'Egypt' and is
biblically referred to as the country of 'Egypt’ (Isaiah 30:1-7)."[i] It so, happens that, in
this reference from Isaiah both the words for "south" and
"Egypt" are used., These are two different words and the word
for "south" cannot be translated, "Egypt" as Rafferty
stated. The word for "Egypt" is Mitzrahyim,
while the word for "south" is negev,
or the Negeb, which is the name given to the section
of Judah lying south of Beersheba. (See Rand
McNally Bible Atlas, Map IX, pp. 240-241) This same word differentiation is
found in Daniel 11 where Egypt is named in verse 43, and the "king of the
south" in verse 40. Now prophetically, the "king of the south"
did represent Egypt only because one of Alexander's generals, Ptolemy, took
Egypt as his section in the division of the Empire following the death of
Alexander the Great.
When Rafferty comes to the
"king of the north," this same display of linguistic knowledge(?) appears again. He writes - "The king of
the north is represented as Babylon in Jeremiah 25:9. This is in harmony with
the Hebrew for 'north' in Daniel 11:40 which is 'Babylonia."' In the first
place, Jeremiah 25:9 does not state that Babylon is the "king of the
north." It merely indicates that Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, was at
that time ruling over "the families of the north." The word for
"north" is tzahphon, and is the word
both in Jeremiah 25:9 and Daniel 11:40, while the word for "Babylon"
is bahvel, or Babel; again two different
words. Biblically, the "king of the north" does not come into a
factor of prophecy until Babylon has long passed from the scene of history as a
power. In his zeal without knowledge, Rafferty"s
final conclusion is the "king of the south" is really among . "the families of the
north" - Soviet Russia to be specific - while the "king of the
north" is represented by the Papacy, a "king of the west" in
relationship to the prophecy setting. This altering of the basic prophecy of
Daniel 8 which prepares the framework for the designations in Daniel 11 of the
"king of the north" and the "king of the south" fits well
into the headlines of recent months, and thus gives a degree of credibility for
what he wrote. At least, it capitalizes on the sensational, even if it is short
on truth and long on linguistic error.
On the back page of Part
II is found a summary headlined - "Daniel Eleven and the King of the
North." In this block occurs an unusual "junk bond" offering of
insight into prophetic interpretation. It reads - "It is the Papacy that
'shall enter also into the glorious land [America]' and cause 'many' to be
'overthrown,' ...". This is Rafferty interpretation of Daniel 11:41. The
only solution to all of this prophetic speculation is to study carefully the
prophecy of Daniel itself where Gabriel is setting forth "that which is
noted in the scripture of truth." (10:21)
In Daniel 8, an expressed
command is given - "Gabriel make this [Daniel] to understand the
vision." From this point on to the close of the book, Gabriel is in close
communication with Daniel. Daniel had seen in vision a ram, and an he-goat with a notable horn which was broken off. In its
place there arose four horns less prestigious, or in Gabriel's words -
"not in his power" - that is, not in the power of the "great
horn." (8:22) These symbols, Gabriel explains in
unequivocal language. The "ram" is declared to be "the kings of
Media and Persia." (8:20) The he-goat represented
not "the American airforce" but "the
king of Grecia" and the great horn "is the first king" or
Alexander the Great. (8:21) In his place would stand
up four kingdoms which were finally reduced to two, and become in Daniel 11,
"the king of the north" and "the king of the south."
The other power in Daniel
8 is the "little horn" which waxed "exceeding great." (8:9)
This "little horn" is defined as coming
forth "out of one of them" clearly separating the power it symbolizes
from being either the "king of the south" or the "king of the
north" at any time in history.
To increase our understanding
of this factor in the prophecy, we need to consider the phrase, "and out
of one of them," from a linguistic viewpoint. in
Hebrew, as well as other languages, nouns have gender, either masculine,
feminine, or neuter. Pronouns referring to these nouns must also have the same
gender as the noun. In Daniel 8:8, the four horns are pictured as extending
"toward the four winds of heaven." Then in verse 9, comes the phrase
- "and out of one of them" - "horns" or "winds"?
In the Hebrew, "horns" is feminine, while "winds" is either
feminine or masculine. The pronoun, "them," is
masculine which would, refer to "winds" rather than to
"horns." However, the SDA
Bible Commentary points out that "this phrase presents confusion of
gender." (Vol. 4, p. 840) While "them" is
masculine, the word for "one" is in its feminine form, thus mixing
the genders in the same phrase. So whether out of one of the horns,
which can be substantiated by historical documentation, or from one of the four
winds which fits the directions emphasized through the vision, the final
designation is that this "little horn" is Rome in both its pagan and
papal phases as distinct from the four horns, and not a part of them.
When the pagan phase of
Rome is introduced in the prophecy of Daniel 11, it is not designated as either the "king of the south" nor the "king
of the north." Daniel 11:19-21 is recognized as describing emperors of
Rome, Julius Caesar through Tiberius, none of which are symbolized as a king of
either the south or the north. Thus when the papal phase enters the continuum
of the prophecy of Daniel 11, it cannot be considered as either of the two
kings. With this factor clearly in mind, the "he" which did
"stand in the glorious land" (Palestine and not America")
fulfilling Daniel 11:16, Will be the same "he" which shall
"enter into the glorious land" as noted in Daniel 11:41, and will be
the "he" which "shall plant the tabernacles of his palace
between the seas in the glorious holy mountain" of Daniel 11:45 - only that the latter
"he" will be the second or papal phase of the "little horn"
of Daniel 8, or "the king"
of Daniel 11:36.
We have given all too
little thought or attention to papal thinking in regard to the Middle East and
Jerusalem. Even though progress has been made in recent years improving
relations between the Roman Catholic church and the
Jews, the Vatican has not to this day offered to extend diplomatic recognition
to Israel. This reluctance to do so disturbs and baffles Jewish leaders.
"Documents issued by the Catholic church
acknowledge the religious significance of Israel, but professor and Nobel
laureate Elie Weisel
stresses that it is of 'absolute importance to the Jewish people' that Israel
be acknowledged politically as well." (National
& International Religion Report, Oct. 22, 1990, p. 2) While no
explanation has been given by the Vatican as to why they have not recognized
the State of Israel, some observers suggest that the Roman Catholic church cannot politically afford to offend its Arab
membership in the Middle East. It should also be noted in passing that
President Bush's White House chief of staff, Sununu, has religious roots
stemming from one of the Uniate or Eastern Rites of
the Roman Catholic church.
The objectives of Papal
Rome call for the internationalization of Jerusalem. On June 30, 1980, the Holy
See lodged with the Security Council of the United Nations, a letter published
the same date In the L'Osservatore Romano
which set forth "the position of the Holy See concerning Jerusalem and all
the holy places." This became Security Council document S/14032. In this
document, a resolution on Palestine approved by the UN, Nov. 29, 1947, is noted
along with a "special statute" for the city of Jerusalem drawn up by
the Trusteeship Council, April 14, 1950 in harmony with the resolution of the
UN. It calls for a "corpus separatum" for
"Jerusalem and the surrounding area" administered by the Trusteeship
Council of the UN. This is the Vatican position. It is totally at cross
purposes with the perspective and the law of the State of Israel.
John Paul II clearly
outlined the Papal view and significance of Jerusalem in an Apostolic Letter
published in L'Osservatore Romano,
April 30, 1984. He wrote:
Before it was the city of Jesus the Redeemer, Jerusalem was the
historic site of the biblical revelation of God, the meeting place, as it were,
of heaven and earth, in which more than in any other place the word of God was
brought to men. ...
Indeed, in so far as she [Jerusalem] is the homeland of the hearts
of all the spiritual descendants of Abraham who hold her very dear, and the
place where, according to faith, the created things of earth encounter the
infinite transcendence of God, Jerusalem stands out as a symbol of the coming
together, or union, and of universal peace or the human family. ...
I think of and long for the day on which we shall all be so
"taught of God" (Jn 6:45) that we shall
listen to his message of peace and reconciliation. I think of the day on which
Jews, Christians and Muslims will greet each other in the city of Jerusalem
with the same greeting of peace with which Christ greeted the disciples after
the resurrection: "Peace be with you" (Jn
20:19). ...
This peace proclaimed by Jesus Christ in the name of the Father who
is in heaven thus makes Jerusalem the living sign of the great ideal of unity,
of brotherhood and of agreement among peoples according to the illuminating
words of the Book of Isaiah: "Many peoples shall
come and say: 'Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of
the God of Jacob; that he may teach us his ways and that we may walk in his
paths"' (Is 2:3).
Consider, whom does the
Bible indicate will be the prime earthly force in the final events of human
history? Who was the one who drew back the iron curtain which had separated
Europe for decades? What is this power's objectives
for Jerusalem? Read the above paragraphs from the Pope's Apostolic Letter once
again. Note that he is basing his objectives on the prophecy of Isaiah 2:3.
Open your Bible and read all of the verses of the context verses 2-6. When are
these verses to be fulfilled? - "It shall come to pass in the last
days."
Observe,
the Pope looks for a time when mankind shall once again be taught of God, and
perceives Jerusalem as the place where the word of God was brought to man -
"where the created things of earth encounter the infinite transcendence of
God." Now read the last part of verse 3 what he envisions will happen
again "for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord
from Jerusalem." - Ask yourself, what kind of a law, and what word would
go forth should he and the one whom he represents be the "movers"?
And they will be!
God plans to have a city
of peace as the center of the whole united earth for "the spiritual descendants of Abraham." It is called the New
Jerusalem. Now note again what is the pope's objective
for, "all the spiritual descendants of Abraham." Herein is the tale
of "two cities" as amplified in the book of Revelation, but God calls
the "Jerusalem" promoted by the "beast" who
carries the woman, "Babylon the great." (See Rev. 17:2-5) Instead of
so much prophetic speculation with "junk bond" interpretations, we
need to know the prophetic word and watch as the scroll unrolls. And it is now
unrolling!
[i] A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament by William Gesenius under the word, negev, meaning "south" cites its use in this one reference as poetically referring to "Egypt." The Modern Reader's Bible which seeks to separate prose from poetry translates verses 6 & 7 as poetry under the title - "An Oracle of the Beasts of the South." The use of the term, "king of the south" in Daniel 11 must be understood, not poetically, but prophetically which was the Ptolemic Kingdom, or Egypt.