THE GODHEAD CONTROVERSY (For the SDA Layman Bible Student) Within the contemporary community of Seventh-day Adventists tragic conditions have developed. There are "know-nothings" within the corporate body, like the pastor, a minister of the gospel, who told the writer of this piece (who is a layman) that he has no use for "heavy theology": all that is necessary for salvation is a simple faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Needless to say, this was the general attitude reflected in his congregation. Then there are the "know-it-alls" among the Independents who spurn formal learning in biblical exegesis, Hebrew, Greek, and the significance of grammatical construction in those ancient Bible languages. They are a product of the doctrinal apostasy within the ranks of the leaders and teachers of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, which has led to a rebellion against the authority of all contemporary Seventh-day Adventist scholarship in the textual exegesis of the Bible. They arm themselves with the Spirit of Prophecy Writings, the writings of the "pioneers," and primarily with Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible for understanding of the Hebrew and Greek. They parade their ignorance to the learned in Bible languages, and to the unlearned who have nevertheless studied diligently; but sadly, they deceive those who have not acquired a desire for the strong meat of God's Word (See Heb. 5:12-14.) It is from the ranks of these impostors that an anti-Trinitarian doctrine of God, a neo semi-Arianism, is spreading through the Seventh-day Adventist community like a spiritual cancer as deadly as Trinitarianism. These self-appointed "messengers" pretentiously claim to be sounding the message of the Fourth Angel, the "Loud Cry" of Rev. 18. The mere fact that they make this claim is proof of the spurious nature of the message. It is highly unlikely that those who are used by God in the "Loud Cry" would be so lacking in humility as to boast that they are the messengers. What these pseudo theologians ignore is the fact that Ellen G. White never claimed inspiration as a Bible Commentator. To the contrary, she made a number of statements such as the following: But don't you quote Sister White. I don't want you ever to quote Sister White until you get your vantage ground where you know where you are. Quote the Bible. Talk the Bible. . . .(SpM 174.1)Lay Sister White right to one side: lay her to one side. Don't you . . quote my words again as long as you live, until you can obey the Bible. . . . But here is the Word, the precious Word, exalted before you today. And don't you give a rap any more what "Sister White said” . . . (SpM 167.2)As to looking to the "Pioneers" for the true doctrine of God, these self-appointed "messengers" gloss over the fact that the early Pioneers held differing, and evolving, views of the Godhead. For example, between 1865 and 1881 Uriah Smith modified his position from Arian to semi-Arian. The question is how can the neo semi-Arians decide which pioneer view of the Godhead to follow? The reality is that they have made an arbitrary choice which is not based on sound biblical exegesis. They also are ignorant of, or willfully ignore, the Bible texts which demonstrate that knowledge and understanding of the Truth of God is an unfolding experience for minds that are led by the Holy Spirit; and in the same vein they fail to recognize the following counsel from Ellen White: We have many lessons to learn, and many, many to unlearn. God and heaven alone are infallible. (RH, July 26, 1892; emphasis added) The truth is an advancing truth, and we must walk in the increasing light. (CW 33.2; emphasis added) As to Strong's Concordance - an authoritative work to be sure; but not sufficiently so for reliance on it as the sole, or even the primary, source of knowledge in Old Testament Hebrew and New Testament Greek. Scholars of the Bible languages know that there are some errors in Strong's. One of them is the use of the Hebrew "Elohim" for the name of God in the Shema (Deut. 6:4.) Here is the KJV translation with Strong's numbers: KJV: Hear H8085, O IsraelH3478: The LORDH3068 our GodH430 is oneH259 LORDH3068:Strong defines number H430 as follows: H430 אֱלֹהִים ’ĕlôhı̂ym el-o-heem' Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative:—angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty. That this is wrong can be demonstrated by the following, taken directly from a Jewish web page - one of many which display the same Hebrew for the Shema:
"The hour has come, the hour is striking and striking at you, the hour and the end!" Eze. 7:6 (Moffatt) |