XXXI - 12(98) Excerpt
“Watchman,
what of the night?”
"The hour has come, the
hour is striking and striking at you,
the hour and the end!" Eze. 7:6 (Moffatt)
SEEING by FAITH
+++++
Excerpt
from WWN12(98)
Seeing by Faith
In the June/July issue of First Things, a writer borrowing from
Mark Noll, on the "scandal of the evangelical mind," writes about
"More Scandals of the Evangelical Mind." The author reared as a
Southern Baptist tells of his odyssey from the conservative mould of his youth
to a more liberal perception of what he once believed. Speaking of his and his
wife's present beliefs, he wrote - "We have also concluded that the Pope
isn't the Antichrist."
The notation at the end of
the article indicated that the author was "a graduate student in history
at the University of Ottawa, Canada." I wrote to
him in care of the History Department of the University, and included with my
letter the tract - "Antichrist - Who Is He?" My letter read in part:
Being a graduate student in history, you can follow the flow of
empires from Babylon to Rome. A close comparison with the prophecy of Daniel 7
reveals basic truth and fingers the one-man government of the Roman Church. The
enclosed tract offers you the documentation. I would suggest a re-thinking of
your conclusion. A close study of history and prophecy provides much light as
to the reality of the present, tearing away the facade with which men and
nations cover themselves.
My letter finally reached
him six weeks later in his new location as a member of the history department
of a California State University. He responded in a hand written note: -
"Thank you for ... the information sent. I do not find 'Antichrist, Who Is
He? convincing, but I do thank you for sending
it."
To this I responded -
"May I suggest, unless you do not believe in the prophetic Word, that with
your background of the flow of history that you give me a more accurate interpretation
of this prophecy. I am interested in truth, truth that is pure and
unadulterated."
Again he responded and wrote
this answer (observe carefully):
I have no alternative interpretation of Daniel 7 to offer you. The
main reason why I reject the view that the pope is the antichrist is that I
have read much of the current pope's writing and I fellowship often with devout
Catholics. I think Catholics are wrong about some important things, but it is
impossible for me to think them in the camp of Antichrist. This probably
strikes you as naive. At any rate, I wish you all the best.
There are
"devout" Roman Catholics. The present Pope has written much, and that
which he has written is "studded" with Biblical references. Consider
the Apostolic Letter outlining the "new" theology of Rome in regard
to Sunday. It contains many Scriptural references even to the acknowledgement
of the original Sabbath as the seventh day. But do we judge by our senses, or
by faith based in the Word of God?
As Eve stood before the
forbidden tree in the Garden of Eden, she "saw that the tree was good for
food, and that it was a pleasure to the
eyes." (Gen. 3:6, Heb.) She thought with her senses ignoring the word
of God which had been spoken to her. On the other hand the victory that
overcomes the world is faith. (I John 5:4) This faith comes by
"hearing," and that hearing is to hear what God says in His Word.
(Rom. 10:17) Being warned that "Satan himself is [to be] transformed into
an angel of light," why should we marvel that "his ministers"
should manifest elements of light? In prophetic language, it is the dragon that
gives to the beast "his power, and his seat, and great authority."
(Rev. 13:2) The language of prophecy is not pleasant language - "dragon,"
"beast," and "false prophet." But to the student of
Scripture it is meaningful; it becomes "a lamp unto (his) feet and a light
unto (his) path." (Ps. 119:105) He perceives through the deceptive
darkness that covers the earth, the path of truth and with the enlightenment of
the Spirit of truth walks therein.
Two questions are asked in The Great Controversy in the chapter,
"The Time of Trouble," which need to be an answered,
not just verbally but in the reality of an experience now as well as in the
forthcoming time of trouble. They read:
Are the people of God now so firmly established upon His word that
they would not yield to the evidence of their senses? Would they, in such a
crisis, cling to the Bible and the Bible only? (p.625)
You cannot be established
upon that which you do not know. Neither can you cling in a crisis to the
Bible, and the Bible only, if you have been clinging to something other than
the Bible in the present. Videos are an excellent means of communication of
events, but as a projection of truth, they have the same effect on the viewer
as TV - the mind gets turned off and the viewer is mesmerized by the speaker.
Helps, there need to be, but this can be served by audio tapes played on a
cassette with a pause button, so that as the Bereans of old, what is said can
be checked against the Word of God. Or, there are written study guides
available if one wants to avail themselves of such. But you say, "This
takes time." True, and it is not as comfortable as sitting back in a
recliner and being lulled into a fatal security - a delusion that has cost many
viewers unrecoverable thousands of dollars and this is just recent past
history. Is it not time, instead of repeating this experience through other
"voices" that each determine that he is going to use the Sabbath hours
for the study of the Word of God even if it means meeting alone.
With all the siren calls for "unity" which have been made
this year by various "independent voices," Is it not time we started
walking by faith and not by sight?
#